Literary Feng Shui

By Victoria Looseleaf

It happened in yoga, when our instructor of more than two decades was reading from her meditation book while her students were in savasana – corpse pose – the insanely delicious posture that consists of lying still, palms up, as we revel in nothingness – the nothingness we’ve achieved after stretching and contorting our bodies in knotty, pretzel-like poses for the previous 90 minutes.

She was reading to us about feng shui. Literally translating as “wind-water,” the Chinese art or practice of positioning objects, especially graves, furniture and buildings (above, the house that inspired Gatsby’s, which obviously needed some kind of feng shui), based on a belief in patterns of yin and yang and the flow of chi (energy), that have positive and negative effects, is now a respected profession with – surprise – a slew of followers.

So, lying in savasana and being open to the universe, our minds, which cannot remain quiet for long (especially this one), recalled the time we first wrote about feng shui, also some 20 years ago: An editor, after hearing about it at a recent business lunch (no doubt at the meat-filled Pacific Dining Car, a favorite watering hole where feng shui would have a hard time finding the back door for the beef), assigned a story about how the offices should be re-decorated.

Were we skeptic? Not about the method, but certainly about the editor, who had no idea who Erté was, the Russian-born French artist synonymous with Art Deco. In fact, in a story we’d recently written about the great theater actress Marian Seldes, wherein we described her as resembling an Erté sculpture, this editor famously responded: ‘Who or what is Erte (pronounced, ‘Airt’) and does he have a first name?’ We replied, ‘Fred.’

As if that weren’t enough, this same editor had never heard of ‘Lalique.’ Hint: The name of French glass designer René Jules Lalique is a symbol of luxury, and being a downtown Los Angeles business owner, it was a travesty that the editor hadn’t a clue, considering the Oviatt Building, on the National Register of Historic Places, not only features Lalique’s signature glass elevator door panels, front and side doors (above) and chandeliers, but also a large panel clock.

Oy!

And we’re loathe to mention a dance review we wrote about the great 20-century terpsichore, Mikhail Baryshnikov, but it’s all part of our feng shui revelry (with Misha obviously in balance at left in a photo by Annie Leibovitz). In our critique (which was a rave, btw), we wrote that, Baryshnikov,  “having spent a life on the stage in tights”…etc., we were duly astonished and mortified to find that our editor had added this insulting, inane aside after the word, ‘tights,’ Ooh, the chafing!’ Of course, we didn’t see this phrase until it had been committed to ink and paper, and needless to say, we just about flipped. And with that editorial bombast, so, too, went our early memories of feng shui.

Seriously, at the end of class, when our minds returned to the present and, in a state of calmness (everything’s relative), we began thinking that in our very own arts journalism career, we’re actually practicing a form of, well, literary feng shui: What is the best way to build a story? Where should it open? How should it close? What direction should it take? What is the energy of the piece? Is it well-balanced?

As professionals, we’re convinced that we are, if not masters of this form, then certainly loyal adherents to the above principles. Perhaps not consciously, but this literary feng shui thing makes sense when considering all the thousands of stories we’ve written over the years. We’re also happy to think that knowing who Erté and Lalique are may have helped a tad, too, though, admittedly, our literary feng shuiness has not yet enabled us to purchase anything by those two Frenchmen. But it has, happily, allowed us to travel to France on numerous occasions, even as recently as last month, where we were thrilled to declare, Bon jour, Aix!

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Literary Feng Shui

April in Aix

By Victoria Looseleaf

As freelance arts journalists, we take what work we can, whenever we can, wherever we can. So when the opportunity arose to travel to Aix-en-Provence, the home of painter Paul Cézanne, we jumped. Well, actually, we flew. So what if it was only for four nights? (And that meant three days, actually, as there were two travel days, with nine – count ‘em – nine time zones traversed in the process.)

But our philosophy has basically been the following: Since we’re not over our jet lag by the time we’re turning around to head back Stateside, the jet lag, once home, is not that bad. (Unless you arrive home to a dead car, but we shan’t get into that…) In any case, we proved this theory before, with two previous 4-night trips, Parma, Italy in October 2011 (for the Verdi Festival), and last August to Zakopane, Poland (where the late composer Henryk Górecki had a mountain home), to see an amazing dance performance and celebrate our birthday, as it happened. And it did happen.

Mais, quel trip we had in Aix! We went to cover Angelin Preljocaj’s world premiere, Les Nuits for Dance Magazine (click here for our review). We don’t even care that it rained matin, midi et soir (well, there was a respite of a few hours, during which time we sat at an outdoor café drinking vin rose). Since we’re from Cleveland (and don’t get us started about the triple, 10-year old kidnapping/rescue of those poor girls – we’re not exactly sure what neighborhood that is, our being from the East side of town), we miss and actually love, love, love la pluie. Even in Europe when we travel. But Aix’s rain did feel more like Amsterdam and den Hague than the South of France.

We’ll also be writing a travel article anon, but did want to mention a few things about our fabulous trip: Firstly, there was time spent at Ballet Preljocaj’s home (since 2006),  the Pavillon Noir, an exquisite building dedicated solely to dance, designed by starchitect Rudy Ricciottoi. Hello, L.A., when will you build a dance venue? We’re waiting…

 

We had a brief tour of the premises, where last-minute rehearsals were taking place for  Les Nuits, based on Scheherazade and The Thousand and One Nights, and which would premiere later that night. By the way, the L.A. Music Center is one of its many commissioners, and the piece, after stopping in such disparate places as Lebanon, Russia and Kazakhstan (and all over Europe), will arrive at the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion in June, 2014.

Though we didn’t have any foie gras (that’s from the north), we had a lovely meal at La Mado, where our placemat was emblazoned with our name and title, “Journaliste.” We also had plenty of vin, frommage and frites during our brief stay, fortifying us for when we finally trekked to Atelier Cézanne (on foot up a steep street), where we were told we couldn’t enter: A busload of 60 tourists had just arrived – late – and there was no room for two very thin media persons. Alas!

We did get to the Saturday market, buying lavender honey (Aix is famous for that purple herb), and sauntered down the streets made famous by tout les artistes impressionists. Then, after the Preljocaj work debuted – it took place at the Grand Théâtre de Provence, not the Pavillon Noir –  there was a lovely cocktail party there, at the Teddy Bar, followed by a fabulous fête at Chez Angelin. There we schmoozed with composers, dancers and other artistes, ate, drank and went wild for the choreographer’s paintings, before slogging back through the streets to Hotel Saint Christophe, where we closed our eyes for about two hours before our taxi came to whisk us away to the Marseille Airport.

But, as we mentioned, we’ll fill you in on more of Aix’s charms, sights and whatever, later. In the interim, put on some Piaf, pour a tall burgundy and hope you, too, can get to France in the not too distant future. It’s funny, but when we went to a screening of the film, Renoir, a few months ago (it’s about the artist during the last years of his life, and though it was beautifully shot, it lacked any real conflict or plot development), it made us long to go to the South of France, and, voilà…we did. (Les Nuits photos, left & top: Jean-Claude Carbonne) To quote one of my favorite peeps, Clyde Barrow, “Ain’t life grand!”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on April in Aix

Chaos (and Closure) in Boston; Dance in L.A.

By Victoria Looseleaf

Have we evolved, devolved or are merely continuing our post 9/11 journey, living in a world fraught with terrorists, pressure-cooker bombs and uncertainties at every turn. For us, we find ourselves looking back fondly on the good old days, i.e. June 14, 1994, when O.J. Simpson (our erstwhile Laguna Beach neighbor, to whom we gave a copy of our then newly-minted Harpnosis album – hint, it didn’t work to distress him), embarked on his slow speed Bronco chase.

Of course, we’re glued to our flat screens, our Twitter accounts and Facebook pages, trying to keep up with all of the breaking news on the dead Chechen, 26-year old Tamerlan Tsarnaev, and his brother Dzhokhar, a 19-year old who brought the city of Boston to its knees and is now talking with hostage negotiators from a boat in a backyard in Watertown (!). And by the time we post this, we assume the teen will be in custody, and we might have more answers.

In the interim, we look to art for healing, especially attending a performance of Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater at the Music Center’s Dorothy Chandler Pavilion. (Click here for tickets.) We’ve been fans for years, having interviewed Judith Jamison, emeritus artistic director of the troupe, a number of times, and also did the first L.A. Times interview with Robert Battle, who currently helms the company and has been broadening the repertory.

It was thrilling, for example, to finally see AAADT dance a Jiří Kylián work, his Petit Mort from 1991 (above, Yannick Lebrun, Kirven James Boyd and Antonio Douthit in a photo by Paul Kolnik). The performers also did rising star Kyle Abraham proud with his Another Night (photo below, Jamar Roberts with Jacqueline Green). And no Ailey program is complete without his beloved 1960 classic, Revelations. Indeed, we just wanted to get up and do our own Rocka-My-Soul moves with the fantastic Ailey dancers during the always brilliant coda. But we refrained from storming the stage and instead made our way home, where we penned our L.A. Times review (and please check out all of Luis Sinco’s gorgeous photos).

 

This just in: Tsarnaev has been captured – alive – but with a gunshot wound, and is now in custody as he makes his way to a Boston hospital. And the world keeps on spinning…

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Chaos (and Closure) in Boston; Dance in L.A.

A Bounty of Balanchine

By Victoria Looseleaf

For balletomanes – indeed, dance lovers of all stripes – there can never be too much Balanchine. To prove that point, Los Angeles Ballet, in its seventh season and to commemorate the 30th anniversary of George Balanchine’s death, has mounted its first ever Balanchine Festival. This may have been the little company that could (click here to read our most recent LAB piece; click here and here for earlier articles), but LAB is now firmly entrenched on hallowed ground – with glorious results.

And if these are growing pains, we want more! Seriously, under the direction of husband-and-wife team Thordal Christensen (formerly artistic director of Royal Danish Ballet) and Colleen Neary (she was a soloist with New York City Ballet, first encountering Balanchine as an 8-year old SAB student, and is now a Balanchine répétiteur, one of about three dozen who are licensed by the George Balanchine Trust to authorize the staging of the master’s ballets worldwide), the troupe has surged to 35 members. Its repertory, too, has mushroomed, as has the company’s command of the stage.

In the first of its two all-Balanchine programs, LAB has mounted four ballets, two premieres (La Sonnanbula and Tchaikovsky Pas de Deux) and two revivals (Concerto Barocco and The Four Temperaments). But hurry, you’ve only got one more chance to catch this stellar evening, dubbed Balanchine Gold, as the final program of this rep is April 6 at Long Beach’s Carpenter Performing Arts Center.

Admittedly, we’re a wee bit biased, as we’ve been writing, talking about and supporting Los Angeles Ballet since its first season’s The Nutcracker in December, 2006. And, we’re also leading pre-concert discussions with Neary at the Valley Performing Arts Center (our next is May 25, 6 pm), while other notable dance folks are doing the same at other venues. (Click here for Balanchine Red information.)

As for the performance, it was absolutely thrilling. From the first work, La Sonnambula (The Sleepwalker – and no, Chelsea Paige Johnston, above, was not under the influence of Ambien, but a vision of ghostly glamour, her tiny forward and backward bourrées a marvel), this short, eerie story ballet captivated. With Zheng Hua Li (above), as the smitten Poet and Alyssa Bross a teasing Coquette, the masked ball took us back to an earlier era, if not all sweetness and light. Joshua Brown’s noble Baron also impressed in this work originally created by Balanchine in 1946 for the Ballet Russe de Monte Carlo.

 

The fiendishly difficult Tchaikovsky Pas de Deux, also new to the company, was effortlessly danced by Bross and guest artist Ulrik Birkkjaer, on loan from The Royal Danish Ballet, where he’s been a principal since 2009.  As Balanchine once said, “When you put a man and a woman onstage together, there already is a story.” This couple told a magnificent tale to discarded music from Swan Lake, Bross’s lightning-fast supported turns and Birkkjaer’s lofty leaps making for a dizzying ride in the work first created in 1960.

 

Concerto Barocco, made in 1941 to Bach’s Concerto for Two Violins, is another showpiece. With Julia Cinquemani and Alynne Noelle as the “violins,” the architecture of the work shone brilliantly, Alexander Castillo (left), the lone male doing the company proud. After making this dance, also for Ballet Russe de Monte Carlo, Balanchine replaced the original costumes with leotards and tights several years later (it had its City Ballet premiere in 1948), thus becoming known as one of his signature black-and-white works.

The concert concluded with The Four Temperaments, a 1946 work with commissioned music by Paul Hindemith. Originally performed for the opening program of Ballet Society, City Ballet’s forerunner, this is another foray into abstract movement, with Hindemith’s score divided into a multi-faceted three-part theme and four equally intricate variations. While the opening section can be looked at as a study in design, Balanchine crafts each ensuing variation as an evocation of the medieval theory of character types, the cast bringing these distinct personalities to life. Kudos to Noelle and Christopher Revels in the second variation, Sanguinic, Li, who impressed in Phlegmatic, the third, and Kate Highstrete (above), a mighty presence in Choleric.

Well worth the trek to Northridge (we actually began our radio career doing weekly arts roundups, The Looseleaf Report, at KCSN), we look forward to seeing Los Angeles Ballet’s next cycle of Balanchine masterpieces (May 11 through June 9). LAB, by keeping the Balanchine flame alive, is also helping put Los Angeles on the dance map, no easy feet, er, feat, in a town known more for churning out mediocrity to the masses. In other words, vive la danse and long live Mr. B!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on A Bounty of Balanchine

Philip Roth: Literary Rock Star

By Victoria Looseleaf

It’s no secret that we’re huge Philip Roth fans – no matter he never responded to the only fan letter we’d ever written. So when he recently announced that Nemesis was his last novel (published in 2010), we were, of course, slightly bereft. (Is that condition possible?) In any case, it seems that as soon as his retirement hit the news, Roth, who turns 80 on March 19, has been all over the place, or at least in the places we frequent (web-wise).

There’s even an upcoming documentary on Roth skedded to air at the end of March on PBS. It’s called Philip Roth: Unmasked, and the New York Times’ A.O. Scott is over the moon about it, saying that Roth is, “marvelous company — expansive, funny, generous and candid.” New York Mag also weighed in, asking a panel of “30 literati to assess his oeuvre” (okay, it was a convocation of mostly young dudes), and found that 77% hailed Roth as America’s greatest living novelist (Don DeLillo was the only other nominated writer). Whatever! It’s an ultra-cool piece, filled with lots of graphics and Rothian goodies.

(Above,  2004 interview for the release of Roth’s brilliant, The Plot Against America.)

 

Ergo, in light of all this, we just wanted to give another shout-out to our favorite American author and to those who might also feel similarly about this titan of words. Hey: We only wish that all of this attention will drive Roth back to his desk and, perhaps, rethink all that retirement nonsense.

Oh, and btw, have a fabulous and very happy birthday, dear Mr. Roth!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Philip Roth: Literary Rock Star

Crazy About Conceptualism

By Victoria Looseleaf

The incredible La Ribot (who normally performs nude), presented a six-hour performance piece, Laughing Hole, at LACMA on Saturday (clothed, we might add). LACMA described the work thusly: “In Laughing Hole a large number of cardboard signs carpet the floor of the gallery where three women amble in continuous laughter using the signs to interact with the audience. As the performance unfolds, the laughter turns into an ambiguous sound indistinguishable from weeping, and the walls of the gallery space are covered with language, enveloping audience and performers alike.”

Alas, while we were unable to get to LACMA, we love La Ribot and were the first to write about her for the Los Angeles Times (click here for that, gulp, 2003 story). We’ve also got the dyed orange mascara brush that she used on a certain body part before she gave it to us after she performed “Mas Distinguidas” (“Still Distinguished”), at Highways Performance Space. Indeed, we love these kinds of conceptual works and though we missed La (her first name is Maria), this time around, we were reminded of a Billy Forsythe installation we saw in Venice last summer at the eighth edition of the dance portion of the Biennale.

Here’s what we wrote for Dance Magazine about the Forsythe piece: “I was so intrigued I returned twice to see Nowhere and Everywhere at the Same Time, an installation by The Forsythe Company that featured Brock Labrenz in a four-hour performance presented on six different nights. This was stamina of heroic proportions, proving that, in this case, youth is not wasted on the young!

Set in a vast space in one of the Arsenale warehouses, the work featured the dancer moving in Forsythe’s signature fashion, with speedy bursts of quirky bends, scrunchy shoulders and questing head-bobs. The predominant sounds were the squeaking of his tennis shoes, as this determined, jeans-clad Adonis moved amidst a lot of weighted silver pendulums that dangled from long lengths of nylon strings, resting inches above the floor. Traversing the area, himself a kind of human pinball, Labrenz sometimes launched the weights in twirling mode, at other moments he contemplated their mere existence.I was told that at the two-hour mark, hot American coffee was brought to Labrenz (no Starbucks here; Venice won’t hear of it…), after which the dancer continued his bird-like prowl, investigating the body and the brick-walled space, while an ever-changing audience, who came and went at leisure, also roamed through the kinetic art. I popped in twice: first during the third hour, and again on another night near the beginning of his performance. On both occasions Labrenz remained unflappable and, in a surreal way, serene, no matter the sweltering summer heat.”

Oh, and while our hearts may still be in Venezia, click here to read our latest L.A. Times story (dateline, Venice, whee), on Wim Vandekeybus and Ultima Vez, we’ve got the troupe’s upcoming gig at UCLA’s Royce Hall March 15-16 in our future. It’s the 25-year anniversary of Wim’s ground-shattering, What The Body Does Not Remember. We’ve got a feeling it will bring back a  lot of  memories. In the meantime, ain’t life grand!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Crazy About Conceptualism

Eurocrashing With Wim Vandekeybus

By Victoria Looseleaf

No strangers to Los Angeles – though it’s been five years – Belgian-based Ultima Vez returns to SoCal this month. The troupe is on a world tour in honor of its 25th anniversary and is performing What the Body Does Not Remember. Artistic director Wim Vandekeybus choreographed the piece in1987 (and danced in it, as well), which put him on the terpsichorean map. It also won him a Bessie Award – not bad for a first dance!

In any case, we had the honor of chatting with him at the eighth edition of the dance portion of the Venice Biennale last summer when he premiered another mind-boggler of a work, Booty Looting. Click here, then, for our Los Angeles Times story and here for our Dance Magazine coverage.

If you haven’t had the opportunity to see Wim’s work and are into hyperdance – or if you have seen Ultima Vez and love the Belgian’s take on raw physicality – get thee to UCLA’s Royce Hall on March 15-16. Alas, Vandekeybus won’t be in town with his troupe, as he’s working on his latest film, Galloping Mind, in Hungary and Romania. What can we say: The dude is jamming…not to mention that he’ll also be curating December Dance in Brussels at the end of the year. (P.S. We hope to be there.)

Photos: Danny Willems

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Eurocrashing With Wim Vandekeybus

The Year So Far

By Victoria Looseleaf

We’ve been on a mini-hiatus, so a belated happy new year, peeps. And what a weird 2013 it’s been already. We lost Huell Howser, folksy journalist who brought California to life for millions and whose legacy lives on through his many PBS television shows. We were particularly upset at his death at age 67, as we got to know him over the years.

In fact, he was a guest on one of our very first Looseleaf Report TV shows, along with the Del Rubio Triplets (all three are also gone now), and it was always great talking with him. He called us not too long ago to say how happy he was that he’d heard our KUSC-FM interview with the Labèque sisters. Goodbye, Huell…you are missed.

 

And just a few weeks ago, The Bolshoi Ballet’s artistic director, Sergei Filin, was attacked by an acid-hurling maniac (Russian authorities still have not caught the perp). Causing a tsunami of attention on this hallowed institution (one that’s been beset by troubles in recent years), the unspeakable act has shown Filin to be an extraordinarily courageous man. After undergoing several eye surgeries, the erstwhile dancer and father of three sons has a hugely positive attitude and says he forgives his attacker. Our heart goes out to him.

But fear is in the air in Russia: Prima ballerina Svetlana Lunkina has defected to Canada (not that any dancer needs to defect from Russia these days); and the Bolshoi recently announced that it has cancelled its new Wayne McGregor Rite of Spring. This is the 100-year anniversary of the Ballets Russes’ Le Sacre du Printemps, and the dance is being staged everywhere around the globe in some form or another. (In October the Netherlands Dance Theater will be mounting its new Re-Rite as part of this year-long celebration, and we’ll be doing the pre-concert talks at the Music Center in L.A.)

We adore McGregor (click here for our coverage of Entity and here for our more recent dance festival coverage, including the Lyon Biennale), and trust that his Rite will be mounted in the not too distant future. As for us, we’re thrilled to be going to the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion tonight (click here for tickets) to see The Joffrey Ballet perform Nijinsky’s reconstructed choreography of this mind-blowing work. (He’s pictured at right as the Golden Slave in Scheherazade.) L.A. also presented the world premiere of Rite in 1987 (top photo by Herbert Migdoll), after a 16-year process of terpsichorean archeology, undertaken by Millicent Hodson and Jeffrey Archer. We’re also ecstatic that there will be an orchestra playing Stravinsky‘s fiendishly difficult score live, no easy task, to be sure.

“But why do they call it a ballet,” a student asked recently.

Well, since Nijinksy was the preeminent male ballet dancer in the world at that time, and wildly broke with convention (indeed, Sacre was anti-ballet, if anything, with the dancers knock-kneed, crouching and far from being on pointe), and there was no term ‘contemporary’ in 1913, this is a legitimate question (if not merely a question of semantics), which brings us to this: What is the difference between modern and contemporary anyway?

That was what Dance Magazine recently asked 10 top choreographers, artistic directors and the like. We only wished we could have included more dance denizens to explore this intriguing topic (click here to read our article), as this is a discussion that never seems to go away. In essence, whether modern or contemporary, the notion reflects the times in which we live, be they troubled: acid-hurling; the economy; wars; information overload – or glorious: Obama’s second inauguration (Beyoncé lip-synched, big whoop); sharing art with friends; or breathing fresh air and waking up to the infinite possibilities of another day…it’s all part of a larger scheme that, hopefully, reveals itself in some way.

To that end, let’s continue our Feburary kick-off  with renewed spirits, including checking out Rudolf Nureyev: A Life in Dance, the beautifully mounted exhibition at San Francisco’s De Young Museum. With more than 70 costumes from ballets danced or choreographed by Nureyev, including Swan Lake and The Nutcracker (the ornate wardrobe pieces, valued from $45,000 to $95,000, are a testament to the dancer’s obsession with detail), as well as a slew of photos, videos and other ephemera chronicling his life, the exhibit was pristinely curated by Jill D’Allessandro. As for ephemera, newspaper clippings from Nureyev’s visits to the Bay Area are also featured, notably one from that 1967 night of infamy, when, after a performance, he and Margot Fonteyn were arrested at a Haight-Ashbury party that police raided over suspected presence of marijuana. (Nureyev, above at right, in Moments, with the Murray Louis Dance Company, 1977. Photograph © Francette Levieux)

But hurry: The exhibition ends February 17, with its greatest achievement making the legendary dancer come alive, or, as Nureyev himself said with his usual dramatic flair, “You only live as long as you dance.” He obviously lives on, in exhibitions such as this and throughout the dance world where his many roles and choreographies light up stages around the globe. As last month marked the 20-year anniversary of this legend’s passing, we’re lucky we had the chance to see him honored in this fantastic exhibition. And, not to worry: If you can’t make it to San Francisco, you might wish to purchase the catalogue, featuring more than 200 photographs, with bilingual text in English and French. In any case, we’re lucky we had him for some 54 years. (Costume at left by Nicholas Giorgiadis for Rudolf Nureyev in the role of Prince Siegfried, Act I, in Swan Lake, Vienna State Opera Ballet, 1964. Photograph by Pascal François/CNCS)

And after the inauguration, the first couple danced…

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Year So Far

More is More: Gatz, The Great

By Victoria Looseleaf

F. Scott Fitzgerald’s masterpiece, The Great Gatsby, spawned five films, including a 1926 silent movie of a stage adaptation, a 1949 Alan Ladd-starring vehicle and a 2002 hip-hop treatise called G in which Jay Gatsby is rendered as a P. Diddy-like mogul. And next spring, Leo DiCaprio fans will be treated to a sixth flick, Baz Luhrmann’s headache-inducing interpretation of what has been called the greatest American novel of the 20th century.  There was also a bad-to-middling TV version with Paul Rudd as Nick Carraway, and ooh, let us not forget John Harbison’s 1999 opera. (We did: After seeing it at the Met, where we were, sadly, underwhelmed, all remnants of Daisy, Tom, Myrtle and the mysterious Gatsby flitted from our brains like so much West Egg flotsam).

There’s also a Korean Web Comic, The Great Catsby. And who knows – perhaps the K-pop scene that spawned Psy’s Gangnam Style will soon release Gatsby Style.

But here’s where all comparisons end: Stop whatever you’re doing and get thee to REDCAT, where a virtuosic staged marathon “reading” is being played out through December 9. Dubbed Gatz, this is the mother of all marathons, including binge-viewings of Homeland, Boardwalk Empire and Downton Abbey, in which Fitzgerald’s classic Jazz Age novel, written in 1925, is “performed” in its entirety (we’re talking word for word, dear readers), by the astonishing Elevator Repair Service. The New York-based theater troupe has also tackled Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury and Hemingway’s The Sun Also Rises. (We tried to catch the latter last summer in Amsterdam, but, alas, it wasn’t meant to be.)

Gatz, however, was. And if you’ve got six hours (not counting two intermissions and a dinner break – a colleague and I hopped on Angels Flight and managed to get tacos and tempura at Grand Central Market minutes before it closed), this is the show to see, one that will sear itself onto your cultural consciousness, inspire you with the magic of all manner of descriptors (fraternal hilarity, anyone?), and take you on a journey that is so desperately needed these days you’ll leave delirious…and, if you can believe, wanting more. Gatz, dare we say, is a theatrical marvel right up there with Tony Kushner’s Angels in America.

Devoid of period sets or costumes (indeed, Louisa Thompson’s shabby business-office rendering becomes a place for reveries, revelries and recriminations, albeit in a Hopperesque way), Gatz sucks you in from its opening words: “In my younger and more vulnerable years …” As read by the magnificent Scott Shepherd – and not in an actorly fashion, that would be too predictable, but in a flat, monotonous voice – Shepherd (a homespun Damian Lewis, our hero, btw), literally, is Nick Carraway, the brutally honest narrator of the novel. (“There are only the pursued, the pursuing, the busy and the tired.”) Honestly, it doesn’t get much better than this.

As bored office workers trickle in and out – and also embody those Fitzgerald folks we know so well, we get to spend quality time with Gatsby (a fabulous Jim Fletcher, whose ‘Old Sport’ moniker seem to make more sense than Robert Redford’s did in the 1974 version, though when we recently saw the Jack Clayton-directed flick again, this time on an Airbus to France, we were kind of digging it – or perhaps it was the wine and the notion of another European sojourn that helped re-illuminate that film’s Fitzgeraldian essence).

In any case: Other thespians of note populating the REDCAT space include Victoria Vazquez’ Daisy Buchanan (“They’re such beautiful shirts,” she sobbed, her voice muffled in the thick folds. “It makes me sad because I’ve never seen such – such beautiful shirts before.”) Then there’s her crass, wealthy hubby, Robert Cucuzza’s Tom, who blusters about spewing prophetic hubris (“If we don’t look out the white race will be – will be utterly submerged”), while Frank Boyd’s sad sack of a husband to Laurena Allan’s doomed Myrtle, also bring a pure pulsing heart to the stage. In fact, you find yourself so submerged in the glorious words of the text, that you’re not so much hearing Shepherd’s colossal anti-speechifying (“Reserving judgments is a matter of infinite hope.”), as living them.

How can this be? Also credit John Collins’ brilliant direction, Ben Williams’ stunning sound design and Mark Barton’s lighting, with the cast of 13 a mostly cohesive bunch. (We didn’t much care for Susie Sokol’s Jordan, whose antics were too, er, antic-y.) Boisterous party scenes butt up against quiet, spare moments, with the words, always the words, rhythmically flowing. Capturing the pathetic drudgery of Myrtle’s existence as well as Long Island’s swanky one-percenters – and everything, it seems, in-between – this stunning realization, made even more so with Shepherd as our guide (no pun intended), is nothing less than a well-oiled machine, beautifully thrumming, humming and ultimately revealing itself…when we, in the eighth hour, hear Fitzgerald’s sublimely final words: “So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.”

 

Humanity, rise up!

Top photo (from left): Scott Shepherd (also in reclining photo), Joe Fletcher, Victoria Vazquez, by Steven Gunther

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on More is More: Gatz, The Great

Au Revoir, Iris

By Victoria Looseleaf

Are we surprised that the $100 million debacle known as Cirque du Soleil’s Iris is set to close January 19? No, not in the least. What was intended to be a permanent show (okay, a 10-year run is something L.A. would deem permanent), at the corner of Hollywood and Highland (another debacle, to be sure), is suffering from a case of…nobody-wanted-to-pay-those-exorbitant-ticket-prices. Hello: When we were there opening night, the top ticket went for $253. with a number of seats having, er, obstructed views. (The theater was never meant for live productions, only for televised events.)

Seriously, housed in the Dolby Theatre (formerly the Kodak, but when film went pfft…so did its ubiquitous name), when the Academy Awards aren’t there (which adds up to about 360 days out of the year), this ill-conceived extravaganza, directed and choreographed by Frenchman Philippe Decoufle (click here for our recent Lyon Dance Biennale review, which included a bad Decoufle retrospective, Panorama, above), bombed big-time. But we knew that Iris was destined for the scrap heap, and didn’t hesitate to pan it for Dance Magazine when the show first opened in September, 2011.

And, trust us, dear readers, we’ve seen our share of Cirques (click here for our coverage of several Vegas spectacles), with this over-the-top production about the movies the nadir of the bunch; and Robert Lepage’s KÀ (above), choreographed by Diavolo’s Jacques Heim, the apex.

Sure, we’re sorry some of our performer friends in Iris will now be unemployed, and we’ve always been peeved that a $30-million loan from L.A.’s Community Development Department was in on the original deal. But think about it: Did our city really need some French-accented production to lure tourists to Hollywood? We think non.

Truth be told: We’re actually surprised Iris lasted as long as it did…and are hoping that the powers-that-be tear down the entire mall, including the Kodak (moving the Oscars back downtown), and put in its stead…a park. And if they’re really intent upon a bit of France at the corner of Hollywood and Highland, let ‘em eat crêpes.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Au Revoir, Iris